UOW Outburst

Factors

Methods of estimation of gas content of coal seams (Lama and Bartosiewicz, 1982)

Method

Requirement

Method of Interpretation

Accuracy

Country

Method of Measurement

Applicability

Reference

Direct Cores Requires knowledge of gas emission laws Depending upon time lost, core quality and applicability of gas emission laws.
±50%- ±20%
UK, USA, Australia Volumetric gas emission atmospheric pressure followed by crushing Good from surface boreholes and doubtful from underground boreholes, fractured cores etc. Degree of fracturing influences results Graham, (1937), Bertard, et al, (1970).
Belin, (1971)
Direct Sampling of fractions Empirical ? Poland Volumetric gas emission Existing mines Ettinger (1958)
Indirect
(statistical)
Lumps of coal Statistical analysis of gas content of lumps ± 20%, statistically measured values from face samples are consistently higher UK Sample (30 – 40 mm size), collection at the face and estimation of gas contents. For seams under mining, face sampling, applicability to highly variable and high rank coals not proved
Indirect
(adsorption isotherms)
Pressure measurement and sampling Direct readings for adsorption isotherms Depending upon pressure measurements and sampling (~10-20%) Poland Russia, Australia, Germany Volumetric techniques and gravimetric techniques For seams under mining and seams lying above or below Lama and Bartosiewicz, (1982)
Aziz and Ming Li (1999)

Indirect Proximate analysis of coal Empirical ~30-100% Russia, USA
Poland
Chemical analysis New and existing mines Ettinger, (1958),
Kim (1977)
Indirect Exhaust ventilation sampling Subtraction techniques ± 20% Australia CH4 or CO2 gas analysis (%) Existing mines Lama, (1980)
Tarnowski (1972)
Indirect Sampling of exhaust mine air Empirical ± 50% Germany,
USA
Volumetric gas emission Existing mines- general make of gas Noak, (1976)